Lenovo Ideacentre Horizon II review – 27 inch monoblock

Lenovo Ideacentre Horizon II review – 27 inch monoblock

Lenovo Ideacentre Horizon II 27 is back and now it’s even better, but alas, it’s not enough. When Lenovo introduced the first Horizon with a touchscreen, built-in battery and flat, foldable design, it sparked everyone’s interest. Within about two weeks. Although interesting, it is too fat, slow and expensive.

Lenovo Ideacentre Horizon II review - 27 inch monoblock

Lenovo Ideacentre Horizon II Monoblock – Reviews

Lenovo didn’t give up on the idea when they saw it didn’t work and introduced the Horizon II 27. The new model is a simple refinement of the same formula. The device is large and flat, with a foldable body and a touch screen, now supported by better hardware and a thinner design.

Lenovo Ideacentre Horizon II Design

The first Lenovo Horizon was 1.2 inches thick and weighed nearly 18 pounds. Both numbers were impressive for a 27-inch all-in-one. Lenovo has corrected this by reducing the thickness to just eight tenths of an inch and achieving an overall weight of 15 pounds. The back is now curved, making it https://jiji.ng/12-wheels-and-rims/alloy easier to move.

The Horizon All-in-One has only three USB 3.0 ports, one of which must be dedicated to a wireless dongle to connect a mouse. There are also audio jacks and an HDMI port. And the crown of all is Wi-Fi at 802.11 and Bluetooth.

Glossy and smooth, the touchscreen is a joy to use.

Lenovo Ideacentre Horizon 2 design

Other aspects of the display were mixed. We measured a palette that covers 97 percent of sRGB and 73 percent of AdobeRGB. The contrast was solid, also striking at a ratio of 720:1.

We did, however, notice a somewhat dull 1.9 gamma (2.2 target) and varying color fidelity. The mean color difference was DeltaE 1.65, a low value. But the difference grew in blue, red and some midtones.

Lenovo Ideacentre Horizon 2 picture and sound

All of these factors add up to a disappointing sum. The low pixel density was notable in HD video, and the inaccurate gamma caused the eyes to tire quickly. Even the high contrast ratio is the result of extremely bright backlighting rather than inky blacks, so images lacked depth.

Sound quality is good. The speakers were loud and delivered crisp sound at maximum volume.